August 24, 2009 Archives

This fresh-out-of-the-shop feature of FlashFiction.Net asks a writer of a piece to interview one of its readers. Here, Joseph Young interviews Michael Kimball about his (short) short "Eleven."

Eleven
Joseph Young

As she read essays, she plaited one side of her hair. You'd last forever, he said,
up from his puzzle. The green light of some vehicle tracked across the ceiling.


How much do you see when you read this story? Do you see the he and the she, do you see a room?

I see a lot when I read this story. I see the he and the she and I see a room. I see the book in her hand, which has a beige and glossy cover. And I see the folded newspaper in his hand, plus a pen in his other hand. I see a window and curtains that are never explicitly mentioned, but are implied. I see the green light, of course, and that takes me across the bedroom, what I first imagine to be a bedroom anyway, and so I see other things—a dresser with things on top of it (a jewelry box, a hairbrush, his wallet, his watch). And because of the green light, I see a car driving down a street that is lined on both sides by other cars, but maybe that is just because I know where you live. One of the things I like about your fiction is that it is full of implication.

It occurs to me that seeing might not be important, but I could be wrong. What is important?

You are wrong. Seeing is important and here is one of the important things—I see not only more than is mentioned, as mentioned above, but I see more than could actually be there. For instance, when I see the room, I see a bedroom (and both of them in bed, the covers pulled up, or maybe just a sheet), and then I also see a living room, her stretched out on a couch and him sitting in a chair or maybe sitting at a table. I see the folded newspaper and the crossword puzzle, but also maybe another kind of puzzle or maybe a book of crossword puzzles. Of course, I know that each thing can only be one thing, but that doesn’t stop me from seeing more than one thing. I also recognize that the puzzle may not be a kind of puzzle at all, but might, instead, be his puzzled state about the couple’s relationship. That’s one of the ways to make sense of the bit of dialogue.

What is the value of a story like this? What does it add? Can it last?

I don’t like this question and I don’t think that you do either. I’m not sure why you’re asking it, but here’s something the story does—it makes me think about a couple, about two people being together, and about the different ways that two people can be together.

Why did I title this story Eleven? I’m not sure I remember.

You titled the story Eleven to suggest time, 11pm, which accounts, in part, for how the green light is possible. That’s the obvious answers. But, really, you titled the story Eleven because, at one point, each of the three sentences had eleven words in them. At another point, you revised the story, leaving only nine words in the second sentence and ten words in the third sentence.

I notice that I’ve avoided specificity to a great degree in this story. Isn’t that bad? What would William Carlos Williams think?

The very nature of your diction is adjectival. That’s good. William Carlos Williams, if he weren’t dead, would think you’re brilliant and he would be a little jealous of what you have done here.


Bios:

Flash Fiction Writer Michael KimballMichael Kimball’s third novel, DEAR EVERYBODY, is just out in the US, UK, and Canada. The Believer calls it “a curatorial masterpiece.” Time Out New York calls the writing “stunning.” And The Los Angeles Times says the book is “funny and warm and sad and heartbreaking.” His first two novels are THE WAY THE FAMILY GOT AWAY (2000) and HOW MUCH OF US THERE WAS (2005), both of which have been translated (or are being translated) into many languages. He is also responsible for the ongoing art project—Michael Kimball Writes Your Life Story (on a postcard)—and the documentary films, I WILL SMASH YOU (2009) and 60 WRITERS/60 PLACES (2010).


Flash Fiction Writer Joseph Young Joseph Young lives and writes in Baltimore, MD. His book of microfictions, Easter Rabbit, in which the story "Eleven" will appear, is forthcoming from Publishing Genius Press in December 2009. Visit Publishing Genius Press for more information and to obtain review copies. His work has appeared recently in Lamination Colony, FRiGG, and wigleaf and is forthcoming in Caketrain and Grey Sparrow. E-mail Joseph here.

One of the reasons I am as prolific as I am, which really isn't to say I'm prolific whatsoever, but to say that I truly do write, is because my little son takes long naps during which I force myself to write. I can't do housework. Not only do I detest doing dishes and get no enjoyment in scouring ovens whatsoever—but do like a clean house I must clarify—but also I can't clean, because he might wake, so I write. My work must be at least tangentially connected to writing for it to be considered work. Otherwise, what I am doing is wasting time.


I must write quickly and with frequent glances toward the sleeping child. I take notes during the day—scribbles on everything but not with as much organization as say Bruce Holland Rogers who whips out index cards from the pocket of his jacket to surreptitiously take notes. What is he writing there?? We try to peek over his sandwich or arm but just as quickly as he snaked out that card, he whisks it back into the pocket to resume tidily slicing his Rueben. I write on the backs of bills—mostly unpaid of course.


This is a reason I write flash fiction.


When he wakes, the stunning wee one and his amazing childhood cannot be missed. Reading is squashed between writing, the things I must attend to, the things I should but don't, the unmopped floor, dog hair in the corner. The sun graces me in morning, lingers above and then flings down past the trees. It happens extraordinarily fast.


Is this confessional? Am I excusing the shower stains, the crammed sink, the laundry barge? Oh perhaps.


A fellow mother-writer-friend of mine is barely writing. She isn't reading. Her house is clean.


More Confessions: Two Flashes Freele Wants To Steal

Every once in awhile I fall upon such a well-written fabulously-told story it brings me to despair. When this happens, I hang my head and whisper I'll never be that good of a writer. There are entire books like that—David Foster Wallace's The Broom of The System. And longer short stories: Roy Kesey's "Wait."


Usually, when I encounter one of these stories, I get scared. Really scared. Scared my work won't ever come close. And then, I try to get out of my self-absorption and study the piece, see what makes it ascend to that breathtaking place.


I've said it before: Matt Bell's "Custard's Last Stand" is one of those stories I have read and reread and reread. Every single time I read it I simultaneously damn Matt for writing this before me and praise him for getting there first.


Why do I love Bell's story so? Because it provokes me to reread. Is it because the reader has to follow clues to find out who the story is about? Is it the use of the word "bastards" in the first sentence—a shocking term for a first line? Is it the way the story gives you growing energy toward an unknown: sweat, anticipation, a charge? The story would be entirely flat—melted ice cream in itself if it went like this: A bunch of overweight kids organize themselves to raid the ice cream truck. Because, then I'd know everything. I think, the success of this story is based on what isn't told, what is held back.


This, a story like Bell's "Custard's Last Stand," is a reason I read short fiction: time, timing, and the idea that a whole big bunch of schtuff can be packed into one teensy little paragraph-sized missive that shines like a green sapphire on a beach of granite.


A bit of a longer flash, Christopher Helmuth's "Tulip," is another piece I've studied. Here, I stopped word by word, sentence by sentence and wrote a story titled "Boots" (unpublished) using an article, noun, verb placed exactly as he did. An exercise in forcing myself to study varied sentence structure.


"Tulip" has fresh and balanced layers of beat and rhythm. Long sentences are paired with short. The second paragraph is a lengthy run-on that spills out, tumbling onto the page to plop in the end with glorious heaviness.


Even though I've read this story twelve times, fifteen, the ending is a puncher. "Tulip" has one of the most spectacular endings I've ever read.


A Not So Big Finale

So, why two? Why only two flashes Freele wants to steal?


Hardly. There are more. There are many more. But, one must flit and go write. And, nevermind the laundry. You can have it.


Toodles.




About the Author


Short Short Fiction Writer Stefanie Freele



Stefanie Freele is the author of a short story collection Feeding Strays (Lost Horse Press). She is on the editorial staff of SmokeLong Quarterly and is the Fiction Editor for Los Angeles Review. Stefanie has an MFA from the Northwest Institute of Literary Arts - Whidbey Writers Workshop. Some of her recent flash fiction can be found in nifty places like Dogzplot, Wigleaf, elimae, Necessary Fiction, and Monkeybicycle.